I have a story i wrote. . .

by **zilabus** » Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:41 am

Haz wrote:also no one could pwn me and zilly

THAT'S RIGHT JID. YOU WHORE. YOU KNOW IT'S TRUE.

by **Maskan** » Fri Jul 17, 2009 4:21 pm

*in his room playing fallout 3*

by **ninamori tsuki** » Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:19 pm

zilabus wrote:
Haz wrote:also no one could pwn me and zilly

THAT'S RIGHT JID. YOU WHORE. YOU KNOW IT'S TRUE.

. . . .*taken aback*

by **Maskan** » Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:22 pm

*needs love*

by **Haz** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 12:01 am

ninamori tsuki wrote:i should hope you don't bleed out of organs in your pelvic area. D:

*sigh* I explained this

by **ninamori tsuki** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 4:15 am

Haz wrote:
ninamori tsuki wrote:i should hope you don't bleed out of organs in your pelvic area. D:

*sigh* I explained this

so? ;D re-explain, in full detail pl0x. :3

by **zilabus** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 5:39 am

Maskan wrote:*in his room playing fallout 3*

Play the originals fagmo. They are better by a ridiculous amount. Because every action you makes actually effects something, and you can play however you fuckin want cause stats matter. Plus, it actually has a story that's non-linear, interesting, and questions morality. Unlike gay ass fallout three, a cockslap romp through an atmosphere that's great, with a story that's ruined.

Are you a INT 3 character? Your two stupid to talk, and you grunt in 1 and 2. In three, stats don't fuckin' mater. Period.

So go. Get one and two. If you don't enjoy them more you have no appretiation for story.

by **SSJIPM** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 8:28 am

Who the hell buys non-Steam PC games anymore? Just pirate them, seriously.

But yes, get Fallout 1 and 2; otherwise you have a vagina.

by **Haz** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 10:12 am

SSJIPM wrote:Who the hell buys non-Steam PC games anymore? Just pirate them, seriously.

But yes, get Fallout 1 and 2; otherwise you have a vagina.

This is all true

by **zilabus** » Sat Jul 18, 2009 11:19 pm

Haz and SSJIPM, two most rockin'-est dudes ever.

by **Maskan** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:20 am

Maskan wrote:*in his room still playing fallout 3*

by **zilabus** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:43 am

Maskan wrote:
Maskan wrote:*in his room still playing fallout 3*

Ahahaaha. So you admit your a blubbering Vagina?

by **Maskan** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 2:57 am

I actully own all three fallouts and fallout: tactics. *commencing fallout 3*

by **zilabus** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 3:56 am

Maskan wrote:I actully own all three fallouts and fallout: tactics. *commencing fallout 1*

Ahh. Much better. Good to know someone appretiates good storytelling.

by **SoapBoxRacer** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 4:26 am

*Here to argue*

It's not really story-telling if it's told in a non-linear fashion. It's more like story-assembling. Albeit it is a great story. But when a developer chooses to tell a story through a non-linear gameplay fashion, and not just a non-linear fashion, then it means they're doing something a little bit more and a little bit less than story-telling. More because every encounter has to be compelling and interesting. Less because there is no real main story, just events loosely placed together, and they rely upon the gameplay style to make the game come together, instead of writing a true narrative.

I'm not saying they were bad. They're some of the best Western RPG's. And I'm not saying Fallout 3's story was good. Pretty much everyone disliked the main story. But, in a way, non-linear games will always be easier to write for, because each encounter can be isolated, and each one is a small, encapsulated story based upon fetch-quests and missions.

I guess it wasn't really an argument. More of a side-note.

Commence ignoring this post.

I have a story i wrote. . .

Re: I have a story i wrote. . .

Re: I have a story i wrote. . .

Who is online